The Art of Seeing the Other: Relationships Without Selfishness

There is a very subtle trap we can fall into in any significant relationship in our lives, whether with a partner, a friend, a teacher or disciple, or someone in our family. The trap is called selfishness, and what makes it so difficult to recognize is that it almost never announces itself as such. Most of the time it arrives disguised as "I know what is right," or "this is best for both of us," or "I am doing all of this for you."

Today I want to speak about this from my own experience in marriage, because it is the space where I have been able to see it most clearly. But as you read, I invite you to think about all of your significant relationships, because what applies between spouses also applies between devotees, between teacher and disciple, between friends, and between brothers and sisters of blood or of the heart, even in our relationship with Krishna.

Neither Erasing Yourself Nor Erasing the Other

There is a tension that every deep relationship faces sooner or later: how much do I yield, and how much do I ask the other person to yield?

If in a relationship I focus only on what I need and dismiss the needs of the other person, that relationship cannot last. But the opposite extreme is not a solution either: if I erase myself completely in order to please the other, over time I suffocate. And from suffocation comes frustration. And from frustration, resentment.

The path that Vedic philosophy proposes is neither blind submission nor the imposition of one's own will. It is something far more delicate and far more demanding: balance. Maintaining genuine awareness of who the other person is, what they feel and need, while the other maintains that same awareness about me. In practice, this means that sometimes I set my own needs aside to respond to theirs. And other times, they do the same for me.

Not out of obligation. Out of genuine love.

Sita and Rama: When the Heart Also Has Reason

One of my favorite examples of this delicate balance comes from the Ramayana.

The Chaitanya Charitamrita reminds us that "the first duty of a chaste woman is to carry out the order of her husband." (CC Antya 7.106) And yet, when Rama asked Sita to remain in the kingdom while He fulfilled His exile in the forest, Sita, recognized as one of the five most chaste women in the entire tradition, insisted on accompanying Him.

Rama's arguments were reasonable: the exile was for Him, not for Her. The forest was dangerous. He wanted to protect Her. But Sita knew something that no logical argument could ignore: her place was beside Rama, not in Ayodhya without Him.

What did they do? Sita renounced comfort in order to be with the one she loved. Rama renounced his vision of keeping her safe and allowed her to come, honoring the deep desire of his wife.

Reason and logic were tempered by the feelings and needs of both. And in that exchange, neither one was ignored or suppressed.

I see this in my own marriage. There are moments when logic says one thing and my wife's heart says another, or the other way around. And I have learned, not without stumbling, that the best decision is almost never the one that only one of us sees. The best decision usually lives in that space between the two of us, where both have yielded something and both have been heard.

Sudama: To Serve the Other Is Also to Serve Oneself

There is another story that moves me deeply every time I remember it.

Sudama was a poor brahmana, disciple and close friend of Lord Krishna. His family lived in very difficult conditions. It was his wife who one day suggested that he go to visit Krishna in Dwaraka to ask for help.

Srila Prabhupada writes about her: "The wife was not very anxious for her own personal welfare, but she was very concerned for her husband, who was such a pious brahmana."

And Sudama, why did he agree to go? Not because he wanted to ask for something for himself. He went because he wanted to see the Lord, and also because he wanted to please his wife, who with such tenderness was seeking to please him.

Neither one was thinking primarily of themselves. Each one was thinking of the other. And from that place, the story moved toward one of the most beautiful demonstrations of friendship and grace in the entire Vaishnava tradition.

That is also a relationship. That can also be a marriage, or a friendship between devotees, or the relationship between a teacher and a disciple: two people who genuinely want what is best for the other, and who make their decisions from that place.

The Selfishness That Cannot See Itself

One of the most dangerous forms of selfishness is the kind that comes wrapped in spiritual certainty. That is, when we are so convinced that our opinion is "the right thing" and "the Krishna conscious thing," that we stop listening to the other person entirely.

Krishnadasa Kaviraja Gosvami describes this with a precision that still surprises me every time I read it: there are devotees who are "expert in arguing, though they have no sense of advanced devotional service." (CC Madhya 2.93)

In other words: we can have very solid arguments, very well constructed, with quotes and references and all the conviction in the world, and still be acting selfishly without realizing it. Because when our position leaves no room for the other person's perspective, some form of selfishness is hiding inside our certainty.

This applies in marriage, of course. But it applies equally between friends, between devotees who have differences of opinion, between a teacher and a disciple who are not communicating well, or between siblings who have spent years unable to reach an agreement.

The remedy is not to yield for the sake of yielding. It is to truly listen. To consider what the other thinks and feels with the same respect we would give our own perspective. That kind of honest listening, without manipulation or self-favoritism, opens the possibility of reaching conclusions that neither of us would have found alone.

When Differences Become Space to Grow

What I have discovered in my marriage is that the differences between my wife and me, when we honor them with humility instead of turning them into a battlefield, become exactly the space where both of us grow.

Not in spite of being different, but because of it.

When both people genuinely want what is best for the other, the focus shifts. It is no longer about who is right. It is about what is best for both. And from that place, the other person stops feeling like an adversary and begins to feel like what they truly are: an ally.

This can exist in any significant relationship. Between devotees who live together, between a teacher who guides and a disciple who grows, between friends who accompany each other on the path, between family members who choose to relate from love rather than from control.

To Close This Note

Selfishness in relationships does not always shout. Sometimes it whispers, with great confidence, that we know what is best. Sometimes it disguises itself as logic, as principles, as what "scripture commands."

Vedic philosophy invites us to something more subtle and more demanding: to truly see the other. To take into account their heart, their needs, their perspective, with the same care with which we consider our own. To yield when it is time to yield, and to hold firm when it is time to hold firm, but always from genuine love and not from control.

Sita and Rama taught us that. So did Sudama and his wife.

And in every relationship we have, there is an opportunity to learn the same lesson.

In which relationship in your life do you find it hardest to truly listen? I would love to read your thoughts in the comments.

References
CC Antya 7.106
CC Madhya 2.93
Srila Prabhupada, commentary on Sudama Brahmana

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

🌙 Faith, Science, and the Moon (Part 1): Beyond the Conspiracy?

Image
In many spiritual communities—and very specifically in mine—the Moon landing is often the   "litmus test"   for faith. If you have ever lost yourself in the corners of the internet or listened to talks in temples and   ashrams , you have surely come across documentaries analyzing shadows, flags waving without air, and the suspicious silence of the stars. But before thinking this is just a "devotee thing," we should look at the data:  more than 20% of people worldwide  harbor doubts about whether we actually set foot on the Moon in 1969. It is a global human phenomenon—a mixture of institutional mistrust and the simple desire not to be deceived. For a practitioner of  Bhakti , however, this doubt often feels like an act of loyalty toward  Srila Prabhupada . But today, in the midst of  2026 , as we watch the  Artemis Missions  send humans back with ultra-high-definition cameras and total transparency, we are at a crossroads. Is our doubt t...
Read more

Drop the Rock, Destroy the Ring

Image
Today I feel inspired to share an analogy that emerged while talking with a friend, an analogy about the invisible and heavy baggage we all carry, and that we must learn to let go of if we truly want to move forward spiritually. In addiction recovery communities such as Alcoholics Anonymous, there is a very famous book and concept called Drop the Rock . It is a powerful metaphor about letting go of character defects, resentments, and fears. The idea is simple: if you are swimming toward the surface while clinging to a heavy rock, you must let it go or you will drown. Recently, while talking with my friend, he compared this idea of “dropping the rock” to my favorite fantasy saga: The Lord of the Rings . It hit me right in the heart. My mind immediately started racing, and the analogies kept lining up. The Lord of the Rings is a story about purification and service!  Dropping the rock IS destroying the Ring. But the way we carry that Ring, who walks with us to destroy it, where it ...
Read more

Emotional Freedom

Image
By H.H. Bir Krishna Das Goswami In my travels I have noticed many devotees suffering from the effects of emotional dependency, or attempting to free themselves from it. I am impelled by my desire and need to help devotees to write about this subject. Emotional dependency can affect GBCs, Presidents, Gurus, brahmacaries, householders, disciples, authorities, preachers, husbands, wives, gurukulis, sannyasis, vanaprasthas, children, women, and just about everyone else. The symptoms of emotional dependency differ from person to person and may include depression, anxiety, anger, backaches, headaches, heartaches, regressive traits, over-dependence, violence, and more. There are two basic categories of persons who are emotionally dependent in our society. One is the dominant authority figure, and the other is the person who is emotionally dependent upon that authority figure. Both types of personalities suffer due to this dynamic. In addition, one may be emotionally dependent upon an in...
Read more